THE SEWARD PARK BUZZ

Proxy Power Revealed

Numbers are not yet available for our current election, but it is our guess that the improved process for processing proxies will prevent fraud. The average percent of votes by proxy for the past three years was over 22%. What will it be this year?

2007 RESULTS

Vote Details					2007 Stats Voters: ??? Machine Voters: ??? Proxy Voters: ??? Percent Proxy: ??? Seats: 4 Candidates: 6 Avg votes/ballot: ???
Candidate	Machine	Proxy	Total	% by Proxy
Filardo	567	107	674	16%
Tjong	538	109	647	17%
MacAvery	332	103	435	24%
Kancso	347	73	420	17%
Benson	320	99	419	24%
Friedland	324	66	390	17%

% of Total Votes

% of Machine Votes

% of Proxy Votes

Candidate

Votes

Candidate

Votes

Candidate

Votes

Filardo

23%

Filardo

23%

Filardo

19%

Tjong

22%

Tjong

22%

Tjong

20%

MacAvery

15%

MacAvery

15%

MacAvery

18%

Kancso

14%

Kancso

14%

Kancso

13%

Benson

14%

Benson

14%

Benson

18%

Friedland

13%

Friedland

13%

Friedland

12%

2006 RESULTS

Vote Details					2006 Stats Voters: 942 Machine Voters: 720 Proxy Voters: 222 Percent Proxy: 23.6 Seats: 5 Candidates: 11 Avg votes/ballot: 4.52
Candidate	Machine	Proxy	Total	% by Proxy
Waldman	452	104	556	19%
Marino	350	88	438	20%
Slater	326	112	438	26%
Rosado	345	81	426	19%
Benson	287	131	418	31%
Tumminia	306	106	412	26%
V. Enger	287	49	336	15%
Keller	213	111	324	34%
Cubberly	222	101	323	31%
Sklar	227	73	300	24%
Danenberg	228	59	287	21%

% of Total Votes

% of Machine Votes

% of Proxy Votes

Candidate

Votes

Candidate

Votes

Candidate

Votes

Waldman

59%

Waldman

63%

Benson

59%

Marino

46%

Marino

49%

Slater

50%

Slater

46%

Rosado

48%

Keller

50%

Rosado

45%

Slater

45%

Tumminia

48%

Benson

44%

Tumminia

43%

Waldman

47%

Tumminia

44%

Benson

40%

Cubberly

45%

V. Enger

36%

V. Enger

40%

Marino

40%

Keller

34%

Danenberg

32%

Rosado

36%

Cubberly

34%

Sklar

32%

Sklar

33%

Sklar

32%

Cubberly

31%

Danenberg

27%

Danenberg

30%

Keller

30%

V. Enger

22%

2005 RESULTS

Vote Details					2005 Stats Voters: 832 Machine Voters: 648 Proxy Voters: 184 Percent Proxy: 22.1 Seats: 4 Candidates: 8 Avg votes/ballot: 3.44
Candidate	Machine	Proxy	Total	% by Proxy
Wolfson	468	90	558	16%
Mandelbaum	359	79	438	18%
Fried	338	66	404	16%
Nettleton	265	51	316	16%
Rosenblum	235	67	302	22%
Benson	256	45	301	15%
Brill	235	64	299	21%
Tjong	184	56	240	23%

% of Total Votes

% of Machine Votes

% of Proxy Votes

Candidate

Votes

Candidate

Votes

Candidate

Votes

Wolfson

67%

Wolfson

72%

Wolfson

49%

Mandelbaum

53%

Mandelbaum

55%

Mandelbaum

43%

Fried

49%

Fried

52%

Rosenblum

36%

Nettleton

38%

Nettleton

41%

Fried

36%

Rosenblum

36%

Benson

40%

Brill

35%

Benson

36%

Rosenblum

36%

Tjong

30%

Brill

36%

Brill

36%

Nettleton

28%

Tjong

29%

Tjong

28%

Benson

24%

2004 RESULTS

Vote Details					2004 Stats Voters: 847 Machine Voters: 658 Proxy Voters: 189 Percent Proxy: 22.3 Seats: 3 Candidates: 7 Avg votes/ballot: 2.71
Candidate	Machine	Proxy	Total	% by Proxy
MacAvery	356	75	431	17%
Berg	361	57	418	14%
Friedland	298	110	408	27%
Kupfer	228	118	346	34%
Bisberg	268	43	311	14%
M. Enger	213	40	253	16%
Elwardany	103	23	126	18%

% of Total Votes

% of Machine Votes

% of Proxy Votes

Candidate

Votes

Candidate

Votes

Candidate

Votes

MacAvery

51%

Berg

55%

Kupfer

62%

Berg

49%

MacAvery

54%

Friedland

58%

Friedland

48%

Friedland

45%

MacAvery

40%

Kupfer

41%

Bisberg

41%

Berg

30%

Bisberg

37%

Kupfer

35%

Bisberg

23%

M. Enger

30%

M. Enger

32%

M. Enger

21%

Elwardany

15%

Elwardany

16%

Elwardany

12%