Will We Need A Trans-Gender Room Next?
I received a flyer under my door regarding establishment of a women's
club. How come there is no check box for "I strongly object
to the establishment of such a club?" I can't imagine there
is broad demand for gender-specific clubs as opposed to general
community rooms. The idea of exclusive clubs seems destined to turn
any community center into a de facto senior center.
As I looked further into the topic, I learned that the Men's Club
managed to start renting the space from us at a nominal fee many
years ago. I'm sure it was a good idea at the time, but it seems
very out-dated. It is an enormous, somewhat shabby room in which
I've never seen more than half-a-dozen people at a time. Are we
planning on replicating this facility in the name of gender equity?
My opinion is that the Mens' Club should be reclaimed for public
Seward Park use. Its facilities should be improved to meet broader
community needs, with with a coffee counter, wireless internet access,
decent furniture, table/board games, a TV and a pool table. If senior
facilities are an issue, perhaps seniors-only hours could be planned.
But regardless of whether you share this opinion or not, isn't
it worrisome that the issue was never brought out to Shareholders
at-large? Who is deciding these things and on what basis?
Our Neighbors Are Talking!
Do you think it is a good idea to have and maintain
separate men's and women's clubs?

Data updated periodically. Last update: July
7, 2004
What's your opinion on this issue?
Members of SPComm, click here
to vote. Not a member? Click here to join
or learn more.
|
|